“Trust
thyself. Every heart vibrates to that iron string.” (Emerson.) A
cornerstone of simplicity is self-reliance, and simplicity is the only
practical antidote to the headaches of complexity.
A new study
at UC San Diego reports the average intake per person in the USA in 2008 was
“33.8 gigabytes of information and 100,000 words per day.” A gigabyte is a billion bytes. No wonder people feel
bombarded, if not trampled, by the “confused jabbering of men.” (Thoreau’s
phrase.)
The
over-looked downside of complexity is that it leads to living second-hand
lives. The incessant drumbeat of should-dos, should-bes, and just plain noise
that rolls in from every direction 24/7 makes it difficult to know thyself.
Nothing can be heard above the din. So, by default, we do as and what we are
told and sold by others.
Emerson
continues: “Insist on yourself; never
imitate. Your own gift you can present every moment with the cumulative force
of a whole life’s cultivation. But of the adopted talent of another, you have
only an extemporaneous, half possession. What I must do is all that concerns
me; not what people think.”
It is very
easy to be a spectator of, rather than a participant in, life. It is possible
today to side step reality, to avoid loving or hating or making difficult
choices—taking some risks. All one has to do is dwell in the wannabe, fantasy
world concocted by media and ad companies. Then “life” is via secondary
sources. The technical name for this is living “vicariously,” an adverb defined
as living one’s life through the
feelings or actions of others, for example, through
celebrities, reality shows, and mindless chatter, even from peers, that
substitutes for thinking on one’s own.
The Grey Twilight
At the opposite end of the how-to-live spectrum is the gold standard set
by President Theodore Roosevelt in a 1899 Chicago speech: “Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even
though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who
neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the grey twilight that
knows not victory nor defeat.”
Feasting on
external messages reflects a want of self-reliance, an “infirmity of will.”
(Emerson) As the current UC San Diego study points out, the steady diet of
bytes is many, many, many times the amount people’s
ancestors could assimilate. Technology has outrun evolution, a human’s capacity
to absorb.
Eric Sevareid, a major CBS news journalist from 1939 to 1977,
forecasted what is happening today: “The bigger the information media, the less
courage and freedom they allow. Bigness means weakness.”
So, just
what is self-reliance? Autonomy? Rugged individualism? Independence? A useful
colloquial definition is: standing on ones own two feet. Autonomy, yes.
“Standing” with no props. Individualism, yes, rugged or smooth. Independence,
yes. “Ones own two feet.” But self-reliance is more. It requires action.
Consider Emerson:
“The world is all gates,
all opportunities, strings of tension waiting to be struck.” But... “The virtue in most
request is conformity.” “There is really no insurmountable barrier save our own
inherent weakness of purpose.”
Simplicity
is the antidote to complexity, and the cornerstone of simplicity is
self-reliance.
No comments:
Post a Comment